Wednesday, November 26, 2008

i love my job

But is it really necessary...

To confirm an “adjournment” of a motion that was never an adjournment at all? (If you’re stupid enough not to file a motion on time for the return date you want, of course it’s going to get bumped to the next motion day. This isn’t an adjournment. It’s you being too stupid to count to 16)

To object to form interrogatories? (These are the Supreme Court approved questions for your type of case. You have an issue with the question, take it up with the Supremes, not me)

To object to a question where it only asks for your name? (what legitimate basis could you POSSIBLY have for this?)

To call me 3 months after declining my client’s offer to represent you in a case and say “whoops! Changed my mind. NOW can you represent me?”

To call me a stubborn, unreasonable, stonewalling junior associate in every letter? (my lovely adversary strikes again… I may be all these things and this may be the nicest thing she’s said about me in this case…but why bother with the attack on my level of experience when YOU have as exactly as much – or as little – experience as I do)

For my business manager to get on my case about an open receivable for TEN CENTS? (I threw a dime on his desk and told him to get a life.)

No wonder there are so many jokes about us lawyers

No comments: